<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">

    <title type="text">SISU Marcom Blog&#45;o&#45;matic</title>
    <subtitle type="text">SISU Marcom Blog&#45;o&#45;matic:Musings and Discoveries from SISU Marcom</subtitle>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/atom/" />
    <updated>2009-08-24T11:28:05Z</updated>
    <rights>Copyright (c) 2009, Tony Long</rights>
    <generator uri="http://expressionengine.com/" version="1.6.6">ExpressionEngine</generator>
    <id>tag:sisumarcom.com,2009:08:24</id>


    <entry>
      <title>Social Media a &#8220;Canary In A Coal Mine&#8221;</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/social_media_a_canary_in_a_coal_mine/" />
      <id>tag:sisumarcom.com,2009:index.php/blogomatic/1.54</id>
      <published>2009-08-24T11:21:04Z</published>
      <updated>2009-08-24T11:28:05Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Tony Long</name>
            <email>tonyl@sisumarcom.com</email>
                  </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>I&#8217;ll allow the good folks at <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/24/technology/internet/24emotion.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=1&amp;hp" title="The New York Times do the talking here">The New York Times do the talking here</a>, but you should do the reading of this article because the business of &#8220;focus group testing&#8221; is about to go the way of the <a href="http://www.victor-victrola.com/" title="Victrola">Victrola</a>.</p>

<p>Specifically, companies have started monitoring Twitter and other social media platforms to gauge public sentiment about specific topics. Companies are buying this information and putting it to use. </p>

<p>And it is a good thing.</p>

<p>Of course, it&#8217;s all preliminary, the science isn&#8217;t rock-solid yet, and there will be more platforms and complexities to add to the mix. But the notion that companies can listen and act does represent something quite exciting for marketing and promotions and product development (and public safety).</p>

<p>Stay tuned.</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Lemonade &#45; The Trailer</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/lemonade_-_the_trailer/" />
      <id>tag:sisumarcom.com,2009:index.php/blogomatic/1.53</id>
      <published>2009-08-10T19:01:53Z</published>
      <updated>2009-08-10T19:02:54Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Tony Long</name>
            <email>tonyl@sisumarcom.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Weird Stuff"
        scheme="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/C3/"
        label="Weird Stuff" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wJltcT7DH7g&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wJltcT7DH7g&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Sour&#8217;s Hibi no neiro</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/sours_hibi_no_neiro/" />
      <id>tag:sisumarcom.com,2009:index.php/blogomatic/1.52</id>
      <published>2009-07-19T20:06:01Z</published>
      <updated>2009-07-19T20:08:02Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Tony Long</name>
            <email>tonyl@sisumarcom.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Weird Stuff"
        scheme="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/C3/"
        label="Weird Stuff" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WfBlUQguvyw&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WfBlUQguvyw&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

<p>Be sure to click through to the YouTube page to see the backstory&#8230;these are real fans that were recruited and impressed into service.</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Kinetic Sculpture As A Business</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/kinetic_sculpture_as_a_business/" />
      <id>tag:sisumarcom.com,2009:index.php/blogomatic/1.51</id>
      <published>2009-07-02T18:02:04Z</published>
      <updated>2009-07-19T18:18:05Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>SISU</name>
            <email>tony@sisumarcom.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Weird Stuff"
        scheme="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/C3/"
        label="Weird Stuff" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p><a href="http://www.greyworld.org/#the_source_/i1" target="_new"><img src="http://www.sisumarcom.com/thinkimages/01eight_stories_high.jpg" width="200" height="299" border="0" align="right"></a>Greyworld is a remarkable agency, founded in Paris and created to enliven public spaces everywhere. Talk about being at the end of the dog&#8217;s tail.</p>

<p>Still, their work is shimmering for not only it&#8217;s imagination but the technical excellence that goes into it. </p>

<p>Take &#8220;The Source,&#8220; installed at the London Stock Exchange in 2004, pictured at right. According to the agency, &#8220;The Source is formed from a grid of cables arranged in a square, 162 cables in all, reaching eight stories to the glass roof. Nine spheres are mounted on each cable and are free to move independently up and down its length.&#8220; The software that operates the motion runs on Python, making it wickedly stable. I can testify from personal experience, the result is quite breathtaking.</p>

<p>So, here&#8217;s the reason why we&#8217;re sharing this with you&#8230;do you believe that mere displays - with no other functional use - can be valuable to a company or brand? Take the concept of &#8220;The Source&#8221; and transfer it to something on your web site, or something your brand might sponsor in a public square for public consumption. Even in this economy&#8230;is creating an arresting visual experience for your brand <i>a bad thing?</i></p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>In Defense of Distraction</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/in_defense_of_distraction/" />
      <id>tag:sisumarcom.com,2009:index.php/blogomatic/1.50</id>
      <published>2009-06-18T17:47:07Z</published>
      <updated>2009-07-19T18:00:08Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>SISU</name>
            <email>tony@sisumarcom.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Trends"
        scheme="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/C1/"
        label="Trends" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>I&#8217;ll be brief because the article is not. About a month ago <i>New York Magazine</i> ran <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/56793/" title="a remarkable article">a remarkable article entitled <u>In Defense of Distraction.</u><p></a> It is a remarkable piece because it addresses a lot of the issues that we here at SISU face when discussing digital media and social media with our clients: &#8220;Who has time for all this stuff?&#8220;</p>

<p>The answer is, we all do. We are all training ourselves every day to multitask. If you think about it, it&#8217;s overwhelming. But if you don&#8217;t think about it, <i>it&#8217;s automatic</i>.</p>

<p>Read it. Actually, you might have to print it out and keep it by the toilet so that you can absorb it in peace and quiet&#8230;</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Data Visualization &#45; How To Really Make The Web Work</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/data_visualization_-_how_to_really_make_the_web_work/" />
      <id>tag:sisumarcom.com,2009:index.php/blogomatic/1.49</id>
      <published>2009-06-02T01:55:25Z</published>
      <updated>2009-06-02T02:13:26Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Tony Long</name>
            <email>tonyl@sisumarcom.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Trends"
        scheme="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/C1/"
        label="Trends" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p><img src="http://www.sisumarcom.com/images/liveplasma_sm.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="300" height="227" align="right" hspace="10" />An excellent blog about web design, &#8220;Webdesignerdepot.com&#8221; delivers a killer primer on siites that excel at data visualization.</p>

<p>Why do we care? Because if a picture is worth 1,000 words, then a picture that describes 1,000 data points must be worth 1,000,000 words. </p>

<p>OK, not buying that? How about this: data is all about ferreting out relationships, and relationships are most efficiently grasped visually.</p>

<p>As we move into a more <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_Web" title="&quot;semantic web&quot;">&#8220;semantic web&#8221;</a> users will come to expect faster, more accurate expression of ideas; <i>cheesy nachos</i> are different than a <i>cheesy pick-up line</i>, but Google doesn&#8217;t really know the difference yet. Don&#8217;t believe me? <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=cheesy&amp;sourceid=navclient-ff&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;rlz=1B3GGGL_enHK233TH234&amp;aq=t" title="Try it for yourself!">Try it for yourself!</a>
</p><br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>How Celebrities SHOULD Do Endorsements</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/how_celebrities_should_do_endorsements/" />
      <id>tag:sisumarcom.com,2009:index.php/blogomatic/1.48</id>
      <published>2009-05-21T22:12:46Z</published>
      <updated>2009-05-21T22:13:47Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Tony Long</name>
            <email>tonyl@sisumarcom.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Weird Stuff"
        scheme="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/C3/"
        label="Weird Stuff" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/t3AWCq6xmAE&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/t3AWCq6xmAE&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Brands Get Local</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/brands_get_local/" />
      <id>tag:sisumarcom.com,2009:index.php/blogomatic/1.47</id>
      <published>2009-05-12T15:51:07Z</published>
      <updated>2009-05-12T16:04:08Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Tony Long</name>
            <email>tonyl@sisumarcom.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Brand Action"
        scheme="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/C2/"
        label="Brand Action" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>From <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/food/2009-05-11-frito-lay-locally-made-chips_N.htm" title="Brands go local">USA Today, the story of a major brand getting local.</a> It reads as a &#8220;people want to eat more healthy&#8221; story, but we see it as a reflection of (at least the perception of) consumers&#8217; awareness and desire for transparency in the marketplace. It&#8217;s the acknowledgement that consumers can take their own decisions, and will dig to find all the facts.</p>

<p>Who deserves the credit for this? Social networking. Think about it&#8230;either the brand becomes more transparent proactively, or it will be forced to do so subject to the actions of consumers who influence their friends and family. Frito-Lay&#8217;s move is very smart, and is well and truly a win-win.</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Whoo!! Whoo!! Who&#8217;s Talking About You?</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/whoo_whoo_whos_talking_about_you/" />
      <id>tag:sisumarcom.com,2009:index.php/blogomatic/1.46</id>
      <published>2009-05-08T16:23:51Z</published>
      <updated>2009-05-08T16:44:53Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Tony Long</name>
            <email>tonyl@sisumarcom.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Trends"
        scheme="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/C1/"
        label="Trends" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p><img src="http://69.65.41.101/~sisumarc/images/uploads/twitter.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="200" height="133" align="right" hspace="8" />Is there no such thing as bad publicity? Are you ready for a time (like, how about now!) when you are not in strict control of how your brand is regarded? (You <i>are</i> in control, actually&#8230;<a href="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/why_web_2.0_social_media_matters_for_brands/" title="Web 2.0 for brands blog post">read this when you&#8217;re done here if you haven&#8217;t already</a>)</p>

<p><a href="http://www.revolutionmagazine.com/News/MostRead/904325/top-100-mentioned-brands-Twitter/" title="Revolution magazine article on Twitter">Revolution magazine recently posted the &#8220;100 most influential brands on Twitter.&#8220;</a> What we found most interesting across the list is the spread in number of mentions, the variances in number of followers (a true sign of the internal strategy toward this channel) and whether they even bother with a corporate Twitter account.</p>

<p>What was even more interesting: Revolution is a UK-based publication&#8230;and the list leans heavily with UK and European brands, or at least brands with strong presences in those places. Is Twitter becoming more localized on the sly? </p>

<p>Twitter is squarely in the hype spotlight right now. Do we think that everyone must be on Twitter? No. Should it be disregarded as a legitimate channel of communications? Definitely not. Is it manageable? Of course&#8230;and we&#8217;d love to show you how!
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>What? Teenagers are just like the rest of us&#8230;on a budget.</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/what_teenagers_are_just_like_the_rest_of_us...on_a_budget/" />
      <id>tag:sisumarcom.com,2009:index.php/blogomatic/1.45</id>
      <published>2009-04-24T21:09:25Z</published>
      <updated>2009-04-28T21:33:26Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Meg</name>
            <email>meg@sisumarcom.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Trends"
        scheme="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/C1/"
        label="Trends" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>Have you ever heard mom-friendly and teenager in the same sentence? I doubt it. <br />
But, times are changing. Tenenagers are in fact just like the rest of us–even Moms (gasp!). It seems teenagers are no longer sold on the designer label and are now looking for the deals.<br />
See <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/23/fashion/23TEENS.html?pagewanted=1&amp;8dpc&amp;_r=2" title="Losing Its Cool at the Mall">Losing Its Cool at the Mall</a> for the latest trend in teenager spending.</p>

<p><br />
<img src="http://69.65.41.101/~sisumarc/images/uploads/23teens-600_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="300" height="174" /></p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>iPods In Use By The Military</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/ipods_in_use_by_the_military/" />
      <id>tag:sisumarcom.com,2009:index.php/blogomatic/1.44</id>
      <published>2009-04-22T16:03:07Z</published>
      <updated>2009-04-20T18:40:08Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Tony Long</name>
            <email>tonyl@sisumarcom.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Weird Stuff"
        scheme="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/C3/"
        label="Weird Stuff" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>The best part of this article is not that it&#8217;s an iPod, but that by US military standards it&#8217;s cheap! LOL: <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/194623" title="read all about it from Newsweek.">read all about it from Newsweek.</a></p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Why Web 2.0 &amp;amp; Social Media Matter For Brands</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/why_web_2.0_social_media_matters_for_brands/" />
      <id>tag:sisumarcom.com,2009:index.php/blogomatic/1.43</id>
      <published>2009-04-20T13:59:28Z</published>
      <updated>2009-06-22T18:28:30Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Tony Long</name>
            <email>tonyl@sisumarcom.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Trends"
        scheme="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/C1/"
        label="Trends" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>Many consumer brands have Facebook pages, they are on Twitter, they lurk on MySpace&#8230;but why? Do these channels actually &#8220;work?&#8220; Except for very few exceptions the answer is probably anything from &#8220;No&#8221; to &#8220;maybe a little,&#8220; but that&#8217;s not a reason to leave. The problem lies in the strategies behind these digital forays. Put simply, digital technologies should be used to engage with a customer&#8217;s analog life. It’s not the medium that matters, it is the message. The way for brands to make these technologies work is to do digital, but think analog.</p>

<p>The growing number of consumers that have fully embraced the digital lifestyle has been a boon for digital agencies, but not necessarily for brands that were coaxed into social networking without any real strategy. (Some even paid big money to be in forgotten cul-de-sacs like SecondLife.) Regular folks use social networks because they’re free, and they can keep using them amidst the disintegrating economy, skyrocketing job losses and stock market free-falls. </p>

<p>Meanwhile, in the department store, supermarket and elsewhere, consumers have stopped spending. This lower consumer spending has resulted in brands pulling promotion and advertising dollars. Print and broadcast media have been suffering mightily from falling ad revenues. Consumers don’t need Time magazine anymore, they can get that content (or similar) online for free without committing to the Time brand. Brands previously relied on the perceived strength of the commitment made between a subscriber and an outlet (like a magazine or newspaper) to balance their advertising spending. The digital realm has all but removed that commitment; a mere banner ad is no replacement.</p>

<p>What&#8217;s a brand to do? How does a brand continue to be present in the lives of consumers? And, most importantly, what kind of effort and money are we talking about?</p>

<p>Brands should endeavor to replace the commitment that a subscriber used to make to an outlet with a commitment <i>from the brand to its audience.</i> The concept of commitment is a very analog concept; it&#8217;s not on or off, it is a fluctuating continuum that requires and rewards constant attention. A brand should target its message and go for fewer but higher quality relationships instead of broad-stroke blanketing. Use the technology to give back to your desired audience, to be a partner with your customers. Recast your customer relationships to be a peer and a resource instead of just a provider of some gizmo. This approach was almost not possible before, but digital technologies make it not only possible but very cost-effective, stretching your budget far beyond what you might have ever imagined. </p>

<p>Want specifics? Here are 4 ideas, just for starters:<br />
1.	Brands develop products. One collateral benefit of product development is knowledge development on a given topic. Give some of this knowledge away through all these digital channels, it will help reinforce your position with your customers and it gives you something to talk about without being to &#8220;me-me-me&#8221; all the time.</p>

<p>2.	Start offering select specific financial incentives exclusively through your web site. Tweet the program, and reward those who tell all their Facebook friends. Customers are hurting and products are moving more slowly, so couponing makes sense. Your CFO will scream about profit margin, but a quick trip to the warehouse or through the inventory report will provide a strong enough argument for moving product at lower margin. Plus, why pay to be part of somebody else’s circular? These are exceptional times that call for exceptional measures&#8230;</p>

<p>3.	Network on behalf of your customers by creating a network they can use. Employ the bully pulpit of your web site or Twitter account to help out of work customers spread the word about their skills and availability. Allow your customers to find each other (they have at least one thing in common&#8230;you!) and help each other. The PR bump from this generous act will lift your brand&#8230;and it is the right thing to do. </p>

<p>4.	Be funny, be useful. Release an iPhone or Blackberry app that brings a smile or a sense of utility. Give it away. Stay on your brand&#8217;s central message, but make the app a secondary reason for the world to see your brand. Done properly it&#8217;s something that long outlives the normal duration of contact with your audience. If a brand&#8217;s lifelong ambition is to become a meme, this is the first step toward getting there in the digital world.</p>

<p>But what about the money? To put it one way, your $2MM brand building ambitions can now be meaningfully executed for around $200,000. Put another way, a properly applied $2MM budget is now worth $20MM in benefit. The rules HAVE changed, and these rules are better for brands if they do digital but think analog.</p>

<p><i><strong>ADDENDUM:</strong> Check out <a href="http://bigfatmarketingblog.com/2009/04/06/dominos-slip-up-reveals-silver-lining/" title="Domino’s Slip-Up Reveals Silver Lining">this article on the Chief Marketer magazine blog about a recent Dominos promotion</a> and keep in mind this metric: <strong>11,000 medium pizzas x about $3 = about $33,000 for 50 million impressions</strong> - who says you need a big budget?</i>
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Q: What&#8217;s Happening To Print Media And The Ad Agencies Who Propped It Up?</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/q_whats_happening_to_print_media/" />
      <id>tag:sisumarcom.com,2009:index.php/blogomatic/1.42</id>
      <published>2009-04-13T15:08:07Z</published>
      <updated>2009-05-07T16:10:08Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Tony Long</name>
            <email>tonyl@sisumarcom.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Trends"
        scheme="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/C1/"
        label="Trends" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>It all started with a fundamentally flawed notion: advertisers will provide a 600-plus percent subsidy of the cost of delivering printed content to &#8220;readers&#8221; (be they subscribers or in a doctor&#8217;s waiting room) as long as ad agencies can manufacture metrics (alchemy) to support the assumption that &#8220;readers&#8221; see and respond to those ads. Costs of production of the media content going up? No worries, charge more for the ads! Can&#8217;t do that? Create more room for ads! It&#8217;s the real estate model done all wrong; real estate values are predicated on scarcity; a magazine / newspaper, with the proper motivation, can always print more pages&#8230;</p>

<p>So now, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/13/business/media/13globe.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business" title="see here,">see here,</a> and <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/business/1503942,sun-times-media-group-bankruptcy-033109.article" title="then see here,">then see here,</a> and then <a href="http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2009/feb/26/rocky-mountain-news-closes-friday-final-edition/" title="see here,">see here,</a> and then&#8230;well, you get the idea: print newspaper editions are dropping like flies. It&#8217;s the same for magazines, where the model is slightly different (higher affinity interest x less frequency = greater ad spend) but the outcome is becoming the same&#8230;shall I pepper you with more links or do you get the picture? (I thought so&#8230;)</p>

<p>What is at the heart of all this? The confusion of the roles of media and the ad agencies who assigned them a zero value. Information is free and should be free. What media does is <i>add value to information.</i> It weights information, effectively ordering it for us; it adds context that derives from the back-story. The media filters, for sure (&#8220;fair and balanced&#8221; is just like beauty). We need media to process, sift, and package information so we can more easily digest it. It&#8217;s not just news: it&#8217;s prose, poetry, criticism, analysis, anything that communicates anything. Newspapers are the most susceptible to the breakdown of the model, and we know magazines are coming next. (What about &#8220;broadcast&#8221; TV? As the Jamaican&#8217;s say, &#8220;Soon come, soon come.&#8220;)</p>

<p>The notion that content of any kind should be free is ludicrous. A magazine or newspaper must charge what it costs to produce. Net readership will plummet, but this <i>new reality of vastly reduced readership numbers</i> is what the real reality has always been; the ad industry has always been loathe to acknowledge it and re-tool accordingly. I get the NY Times online for free; I&#8217;d gladly pay full fare for it if they made me do it. Same for the Economist and Wired; I subscribe to these magazine but this cannot cover all their online costs as well. I already pay Comcast, HBO, Sirius Satellite Radio and National Public Radio for access to value-added content. The BBC imposes a tax on subjects to cover its costs, and it&#8217;s really quaint: &#8220;The annual cost of a colour TV licence (set by the Government) is currently £142.50. That works out at less than £12 per month - about 39p per day for each household.&#8220; (<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/info/licencefee/" title="Read the entire license fee explanation.">Read the entire license fee explanation.</a>) And, yet, I get the BBC online for free. Why not charge me the same $210.92? I&#8217;d happily pay&#8230;or, if I thought it not worthwhile, I wouldn&#8217;t.</p>

<p>Where are ad agencies in all this? Exactly where they have been; in the role of evaluating the best fit between a brand and where it wants to be seen. But the metrics will have to change dramatically. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/13/technology/start-ups/13hyperlocal.html?ref=business" title="It is already clear that the notion of &quot;newspaper&quot; is rapidly evolving">It is already clear that the notion of &#8220;newspaper&#8221; is rapidly evolving</a>...<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/27/emchristian-science-monit_n_179925.html" title="maybe too rapidly for some.">maybe too rapidly for some.</a>&nbsp; And, as we have seen, <a href="http://adage.com/agencynews/article?article_id=135781" title="many agencies tragically don't get it.">many agencies tragically don&#8217;t get it.</a> Agencies have the responsibility to show brands where they should be seen and how they should be experienced, to support their core strategies. This means acknowledging the new rules of the new game, on the new playing field. </p>

<p>Are you ready?</p>

<p><i></i>Addendum: <a href="http://www.poptech.org/blog/index.php/archives/3052/" title="Read also this excellent posting about the newspaper model from Pop! Tech by Tim Leberecht.">Read also this excellent posting about the newspaper model from Pop! Tech by Tim Leberecht.</a> And share your thoughts!</i></p>

<p><i>New Addendum:</i> Rupert Murdoch agrees with me! (Well, he agrees that a free online model is flawed and can come to no good&#8230;<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/may/07/rupert-murdoch-charging-websites" title="read about it here from the Guardian Online&#8230;before they make you pay for it!">read about it here from the Guardian Online&#8230;QUICK before they make you pay for it!</a></p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Business Card Wars</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/business_card_wars/" />
      <id>tag:sisumarcom.com,2009:index.php/blogomatic/1.41</id>
      <published>2009-04-09T20:05:49Z</published>
      <updated>2009-04-09T20:18:51Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Natalie</name>
            <email>natalie@sisumarcom.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Weird Stuff"
        scheme="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/C3/"
        label="Weird Stuff" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>How many business cards have you come in contact with over the course of your life? Did any of them STICK OUT more than others? If you are in the market to redesign and print new business cards, watch this video before doing so. It might give you a few pointers.</p>

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4YBxeDN4tbk&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4YBxeDN4tbk&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

<p>Then, watch this video: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoIvd3zzu4Y&amp;fmt=18" title="YouTube">YouTube</a></p>

<p>&nbsp;</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Hurry&#45;Up Marketing</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/hurry-up_marketing/" />
      <id>tag:sisumarcom.com,2009:index.php/blogomatic/1.40</id>
      <published>2009-04-09T16:06:11Z</published>
      <updated>2009-04-09T16:24:12Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Tony Long</name>
            <email>tonyl@sisumarcom.com</email>
                  </author>

      <category term="Brand Action"
        scheme="http://www.sisumarcom.com/index.php/blogomatic/C2/"
        label="Brand Action" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>Really, it makes all kinds of sense&#8230;fueling a <a href="http://www.wordspy.com/words/tweetup.asp" title="&quot;tweet up&quot;">&#8220;tweet up&#8221;</a> with pizza. But now it seems that <a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=135876" title="Kraft - through its DiGiorno brand - is taking it further.">Kraft - through its DiGiorno brand - is taking it further.</a></p>

<p>But, can social media really enhance the relevance of something like frozen pizza, which is a borderline commodity?</p>

<p>The article notes a little later on that the DiGiorno has been one of the more technologically advanced brands in the Kraft quivver. They intercepted &#8220;Yelp and Citysearch users looking for &#8216;pizza delivery&#8217; and instead offered DiGiorno.&#8220; This to me seems a more interesting and grippy way to propagate the brand.</p>

<p>Now here&#8217;s the catch&#8230;what happens if the pizza sucks? How quickly will that word spread?</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>


</feed>